So can anyone explain that to me, because I'm getting depressed slowly and start having nightmares ) I know some of you probably will say that Nvidia cards are better, but still comparing them in games ( i done a lot of research before purchase ) my card have better performance. I'll give some examples, my Graphic Score is 841 ( using XFX r9 280x DD Black Edition ), comparing that to MSI GTX 760 Gaming OC Edition which scores 882 ( according to GD my GPU is 16% better ) and EVGA GTX 660 Ti sc Edition with score of 920 ( again 22% weaker than my card ), all of that don't make sense for me. What I noticed ( maybe I'm wrong, that's why I'm writing this ) is that weaker Nvidia cards get better scores. With NovaBench Score I was happy but then I start comparing other members scores with my. I did add some benchmarks mostly to check what my " beast " can achieve. Run the program and then click on Start Tests.
Once you download it, go ahead and install it. I like it because it’s very easy to use and it gives you simple easy-to-understand results.
It was ok for low graphic playing but I always want something better and here I'm with my current rig. Novabench is a small benchmark program that lets you benchmark your PC in just a few minutes. Gpu is running around 37c according to Speccy.
card to the right of the Graphics heading in the middle of the Novabench window. According to AMD Overdrive, my cpu is running between 48-51c but Speccy is saying it's running between 19-20c. The first graph shows the G3D Mark values of each Videocard selected. 1127 Novabench score with 11th Gen Intel Core i5-1135G7 CPU and Intel Iris Xe Graphics GPU.
of 3 < Prev 1 2 3 Next > philquad Member. Most things that are running aren't taking up a lot of memory and such.I recently build my new PC and I'm really proud of that build, only because it's my first so strong PC, before I had some old Phenom and low end AMD graphic card. Discussion in 'Overclocking & Hardware' started by spit051261, Oct 17, 2020.
I guess the maths really doesn't work out.Written by: passo1987 - 22:41 Jan-15-2015 An online repository is available where submitted scores can be compared. The program tests the performance of computer components and assigns proprietary scores, with higher scores indicating better performance. 3.215 * 4 * 43 * 1.35 = 746īut the actual result was 1006. Discussion in 'Overclocking & Hardware' started by spit051261, Oct 17, 2020. Novabench is a computer benchmarking utility for Microsoft Windows, macOS, and Linux. Thinking about it, I'll compare to the 10100. I dunno if anyone's ever going to post their 8700k but you'd expect that score to be around 926 * 1.35 =1250.īut if you, Shane, get bored enough, I'd be curious how close your result with HT disabled would be to 1607 shot rights below base bad involved kept largest ist bank future especially beginning mark movement section female magazine plan professor lord longer. That's gotta be close to the theoretical max of HT benefit? So HT for your score should be worth about 3.5 cores.
I have a GTX 1060 so I cannot drive a lot of games above 1080p so I stuck to that, but I was surprised to find that even though the size of the monitor is the same, the games looked much worse and blurry compared to how they looked before even though it's the same 1080p image stretched to a same 32 inch sized display.
My score 926 / 6 (cores) / 48 (multiplier) = 3.215 A few months ago I upgraded from a 32 inch 1080p TV to a 32 inch 4k monitor. So perhaps those are factors too.īut assuming that makes zero difference (bold, I know). Write Speed: 1127 MB/sRead Speed: 1432 MB/s. There could still be other differences - like my cache is smaller, and runs at 4.0 flat, and only cas18 3600. 1190 Novabench score with Intel Core i5-10210U CPU and Intel UHD Graphics GPU. Coffee Lake and Comet Lake are fundamentally the same cores, right? But you have 10+10, I have 6, and you're 200mhz faster.